> So what is his point with this tid-bit? Why discuss it? What is it's > relevance? You keep saying: "I pointed out that this is what makes it ridiculous - he offers opinions on policy based on nothing but the theory that team A is better than team B."
And I keep asking for examples. To help you out I gave a link to part of today's show. You're supposed to read it and find me an example of when Rush claims that Marc Rich or Clinton are wrong because they're Liberal...or something to that extent. And... since there was mention of Rush still talking about Clinton all these years later it kind of fits in with Dana's way of thinking :) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - RUWebby http://www.ruwebby.com Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:139707 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
