Cameron Childress wrote: >>I wasn't really too clear, but I'm for the private accounts if the >>government can spell out all the cost before hand. Cameron makes a very >>very good point. If this is done correctly, it would be a major anomaly. > > > I'm glad someone here can do math. :)
I should have written, "If this is done correctly, it would be a major anomaly if private accounts do not yield more money to retire with." I'm glad I can do basic arithmetic too. I find it handy now and then. =) I'm all for the abolishment of SS on the princple of it. It is a pyramid scam. The type were you send $1 to 5 people in front of you to get $1 from 5 people behind you. The initial age for SS was beyond the life expetency. It's a sham. I've only worked full time since 1999, but I'm going to insist that every dollar I put in be returned. With interest. But I'm very wary of replacing a bad system with a worse system. Not that I'm saying private accounts are worse. Not enough info right now to make that call. -- 2004 - The year $184M couldn't buy a pennant. Ron Artest: Extremely flawed, very accidental, semi-martyr ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:143226 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
