> Dana wrote: > No, 19 judges have agreed that he is entitled, under Florida law and > the ruling of the first judge, to make that determination. It's a > distinction you still don't seem to grasp. >
First I'm not sure that that's true as it's different from what experts have told me. Second, even if is, practically (a state of mind you don't seem to grasp) it means the same damn thing. Put in a less confrontational way, it is my understanding that the 19 judges ruled on the merits of the decision. BUT - let's say I'm wrong. Then surely that would be a violation of due process? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:151632 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
