> Dana wrote: > so are you taking the bet? > There's no interesting bet here because I'm saying the autopsy and abuse are completely unrelated events based on what I've read.
Implying that Mr. Schiavo would be against an autopsy as some some sort of cover up not only doesn't match the facts, but it doesn't make sense. That makes you guilty of slander and defamation of character unless you have some reasonable basis for these claims. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase Captivate from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=52 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:151940 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
