Gruss, the first link I sent you was for auto liability. But it is a general principal of law in in this country. Really. Go to findlaw and type in, hmm I think I used "primer trial vs appeals"
See all the categories where this exact same article appears. Dana On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:13:51 -0600, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dana wrote: > > On appeal you can only say there were problems with the > > original trial. You cannot introduce new evidence. I'd be interested > > in seeing any legal authority you have that says this isn't so. > > > > First, I think that's only for criminal trials and I'm not sure if it > applies to civil ones. Second, I believe the appeal judge can > overturn if she feels the finding was based on incomplete or > inaccurate evidence. > > Put another way, every judge that reviewed the case felt the finding > was based on sufficient and accurate evidence. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:152298 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
