you're stuck on that. He was apparently her most distant caretaker, so how could he possibly know whether the diagnosis was correct? But maybe we are on the crux of the difference between us here. While what was done was in accordance with Florida law, sure, it troubles me that the law presumes a certitude whose validity I question. I know quite a few people whose mothers were told that giving birth to them was essentially child abuse.
Dana On 5/5/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ray wrote: > > Did anyone see the story about the brain damaged fireman who woke up > > after 9 years? > > > > Maybe they shouldn't have let Terry go? > > > > LOL! Great post. Well, my position throughout the Schiavo case was > not on the medical merits of the case, but on the legal ones. Since I > am for guardian-determined medical decisions I supported Mr. Schiavo's > side of the case. > > While I think a due diligence is necessary if there is a challenge, > Mr. Schiavo appears to have had that years ago. > > The recent cases were just a confirmation of what many already knew > was right - that Mr. Schiavo, and he alone, had the right to determine > his wife's course of treatment. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=17 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:156459 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
