Heh, that's how I took it too. Like the ticks on a graph. We can assume the graph continues to infinity, but the relevant scope is all that matters.
On 7/7/05, Jim Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I figured it was like every physics teacher I had in college "Ok, for > the sake of arguemtn, assume there is no friction or resistance to > impede motion..." or "Now, for the purposes of this equation, this > velocity can be rounded to the nearest 10" or the like. Maybe wrong, > but I took it in stride. > > - Jim ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:163435 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
