Amen. Preach it. Dana
On 8/8/05, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Who would have thought that the court would allow local government to > seize your land for economic gain? > > Who would have thought that the 16th Amendment would be able to get the > support of all the states and the legislature? > > Who would have thought that we Americans would put people into camps > based on race? > > Who would have thought that we would use US against non-violent protesters? > > Who would have thought that the Reserves and National Guard would have > to bail out the active duty services? > > Who would have thought that the FBI would be able to request your > reading list without a warrant? > > Who would have thought that a sitting president would have his staff > burglarize an opponents office? > > Who would have thought that the US would start assassinating people > again (not that I am against this)? > > I mean seriously. All these things have happened at one time or another. > > Tim > > Robert Munn wrote: > > Anyone who seriously thinks such a plan could pass in Congress, be signed > > into law by the President, or be upheld in federal courts needs to examine > > the root causes of their extreme paranoia. > > > > You don't even have to go into any of the details of the plan to find a > > Constitutional objection. On its face, such a plan would require forced > > medical procedures on the entire population. Do you seriously think that 1. > > courts would uphold the legality of the medical procedure or 2. doctors > > would agree to perform the medical procedure on the ENTIRE population? > > > > > > > > > >>Mmm..Came up with this all on his own did he? > >> > >>Tactfully ignoring that the idea has been bandied about several times, > >>and pushed hard by Verichip itself and mentioned by other members of > >>the current regime in the US. > >> > >>http://www.rednova.com/news/health/196561/health_chips_could_help_patients_in_us/ > >> > >>If you can't see the negative implications of this for Privacy, then > >>you have no concern for your privacy. > >>If you can't see the implications for abuse, and violation of civil > >>rights, then you have no concept of civil rights, and I wouldn't know > >>where to begin explaining them to you. > >> > >>There is a Clear and Obvious difference between a Card that you must > >>show when requested, and a chip that can be used to broadcast your > >>location and whereabouts without your knowledge. > >> > >>To those that said it's a 'low power' signal that can not be tracked, > >>this has already been proven to be patently FALSE in recent threads > >>about RFID technology. It CAN be tracked by receivers of the correct > >>power and it CAN be tracked from a great distance and even easier if > >>there is a network of these receivers. > >> > >>If one cannot understand why dictatorships and totalitarian regimes > >>would love to have every member of the populace tagged and bagged then > >>one is under some rather rosy misconceptions about dictatorships and > >>totalitarian regimes. > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase RoboHelp from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=59 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:168508 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
