The only thing I would disagree with would be this:

 >I could also take the route some have and attempt to minimize the 
 >dialect (just use "d", "t" and "f" instead of "data", "type" and 
 >"fields" and use single digits to represent the data types) but as 
much >space as that would save it's always just annoyed me...

Only because XML is supposed to be human readable.

Aside from that, and that fact that they are forcing you to reinvent the 
wheel, it seems like it would be really flexible for different types of 
data.

Tim Heald
Senior Web Developer
TeraTech, Inc.
2003 Winner CFDJ awards Best Consulting Service

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: 1-301-424-3903 x111
Web:   http://www.teratech.com


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:169277
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to