The only thing I would disagree with would be this: >I could also take the route some have and attempt to minimize the >dialect (just use "d", "t" and "f" instead of "data", "type" and >"fields" and use single digits to represent the data types) but as much >space as that would save it's always just annoyed me...
Only because XML is supposed to be human readable. Aside from that, and that fact that they are forcing you to reinvent the wheel, it seems like it would be really flexible for different types of data. Tim Heald Senior Web Developer TeraTech, Inc. 2003 Winner CFDJ awards Best Consulting Service Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: 1-301-424-3903 x111 Web: http://www.teratech.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:169277 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54