Rated movies submit themselves for ratings, which is generally required for being shown in theatres. Video releases, however, don't have to be rated. Basically, the rating is only necessary if you want someone else to show your movie in public.
So, given that porn sites aren't getting paid by theatres to have the movies shown, what's the overriding reason they'll go with this system? Not that I necessarily disagree with the .xxx suffix. I just don't think "x-rated stuff goes here" is enforcable. --Ben Ken Ketsdever wrote: > What is the difference between movie ratings? > > G > PG > R > X > > Apply similar standards. If the content of a site would receive a "R" > rating according to movie standards then it does not have to have a .xxx > extension. > > If the content would receive a movie rating of X then the site needs > ..xxx It works in the movie industry it could work here too. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:169595 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54