> Sam wrote: > First off I don't support pork. > Pork is part of doing business and always will be, it's the oil that
So you do support it? I think you're Bush-whipped. You see, Sam, you can't have your cake and eat it too. You claim to be economically conservative, but you also claim to support Mr. Bush. Those 2 are not logically consistent. Mr. Reagan, BTW, vetoed a bill with 10 of billions less pork. He didn't agree with your "oil" theory because he understood that that was just a cowardly excuse for hypocrites. So which is it? Are you economically conservative or simply Bush-whipped? Don't be embarrassed to admit you're Bush-Whipped, but be honorable enough to admit it. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase Studio MX with Flash Pro from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=51 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:171827 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
