I'm not even going to respond to your personal attacks. I did not insult or try to insult you. So why the temper tantrum?
On 12/19/05, Chesty Puller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You noticed what? Dude, I think you're in outer space. Why the hell do you > even care what I do or don't respond to? Anything that I don't talk about on > the list is because I'm either not interested, too busy or already wrapped > up in other threads. > > On the Bush eavesdropping issue, I don't have enough information to make a > decision. For one point, I have nothing to hide and don't care. On another > point, I think that it is necessary to route out the insurgents living among > us. Thirdly, I have no idea whether or not it's legal. Finally, I think > it's probably related to some privacy issue that I know nothing about and > therefore have no opinion. But if you think that for a moment that my lack > of a response indicates some sort of opinion on an issue, you're really > egotistical, paranoid, and a megalomaniac. You should get off the high > horse, Larry. It's not going anywhere. > > - Matt > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Community" <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 9:59 AM > Subject: Re: Iran > > > > Lets parse the amendment shall we: > > > > "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free > > state," > > > > Clearly refers to a non-federal military arm. The remaining parts of > > the amendment are subordinate. > > > > As for your example its irrelevant. I'll give you a better one, what > > would you do if the Bush administration began freely violating US law > > authorizing actions against US citizens multiple times. > > > > Are you willing to actively resist that? I've noticed that you've been > > very quiet about this issue: > > > > "President Bush acknowledged Saturday that since October 2001 he has > > authorized the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on international > > phone calls and e-mails of people within the United States without > > seeking warrants from courts." > > > > > > > > On 12/19/05, Chesty Puller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Whether you or anybody else believes it, I do happen to beleive that the > >> right of the person to keep and bear arms in order to protect themselves > >> from a governement run amok. What would you do if the the Bush > >> Administration shut down the border and started executing Canadians? You > >> should have the right to bear arms, .50 cal included. Should it be > >> regulated? Yes, I do believe it should be registered,but not infringed > >> upon. I'm not even a gun owner not a member of the NRA, which I do > >> believe > >> is a fringe group, but I realize that weapons are the reason there is a > >> US > >> today, and the right to bear arms is as important as the right to free > >> speech. > >> > >> - Matt > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> To: "CF-Community" <[email protected]> > >> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 9:22 AM > >> Subject: Re: Iran > >> > >> > >> > The phrase "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security > >> > of a free state," is frequently and most conviently forgotten about in > >> > the pro gun lobby's propaganda effort. The full amendment is "A well > >> > regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, > >> > the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be > >> > infringed." > >> > > >> > The common legal consensus, and one that the SCOTUS has followed for > >> > over a century now is that the second amendment mainly refers to > >> > protections afforded the individual states regarding the establishment > >> > of reserves and the National Guard, and not to allow any drooling > >> > idiot the right to purchase a 50 cal. machine gun. > >> > > >> > larry > >> > > >> > > >> > On 12/19/05, Chesty Puller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> What are you talking about? > >> >> > >> >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> >> From: "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> To: "CF-Community" <[email protected]> > >> >> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 9:14 AM > >> >> Subject: Re: Iran > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > how about the entire 2nd amendment, and not the edited version that > >> >> > the NRA propaganda machine keeps spouting. > >> >> > > >> >> > larry > >> >> > > >> >> > On 12/19/05, Chesty Puller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> >> So I guess this brings up the 2nd Amendment. Are you for/against > >> >> >> it, > >> >> >> and > >> >> >> why? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> - Matt > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> >> >> From: "Kevin Graeme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> >> To: "CF-Community" <[email protected]> > >> >> >> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 9:07 AM > >> >> >> Subject: Re: Iran > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Ugh. That's disgusting. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > On 12/19/05, Chesty Puller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> >> >> http://www.gac.20m.com/self-def.htm > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> - Matt > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:188717 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
