Ok, for some reason I thought you were suggesting wal-mart needed to charge more to prevent this from happening.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tim Heald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 11:30 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: [signs of sanity] MD no longer subsidizing Walmart > > No, the problem is that the state of Maryland is now going to cut into > their > very small profits. > > Other states will follow suit. > > When that happens thy can't afford to run the same way anymore. > > They got out of business. > > All the people that lose their jobs stop buying things. > > Lots of other people lose their jobs. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 11:24 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: [signs of sanity] MD no longer subsidizing Walmart > > > > So, let me get this strait, a company that keeps prices low, > > and doesn't have major profits is a bad thing? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:192256 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
