I'm not surprised.  Maine is a very left leaning state.  The worst part is
that their economy is in ruins aside from the fishing industry and tourism.
They have had a looters government there for a long time. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 10:01 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: [signs of sanity] MD no longer subsidizing Walmart
> 
> I've not been following this thread, but Tim, thought you'd 
> be interested to know that Maine is seriously considering 
> following MD's lead and passing a similar law.
> 
> Tim Heald wrote:
> > Most of what we are talking about is state and local governments 
> > giving them tax breaks.  How is this big government?
> > 
> > Shouldn't local government try to foster economic growth? 
> > 
> > 
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 9:21 AM
> >>To: CF-Community
> >>Subject: Re: [signs of sanity] MD no longer subsidizing Walmart
> >>
> >>Yeah, I suspected you were thinking that was what we were saying.
> >>Which is why I said we're talking past each other.
> >>
> >>"Our" side is saying that wal-mart is actually playing and creating 
> >>big government for their exclusive corporate benefit. See 
> the emminent 
> >>domain, tax subsidies, and road reconstruction points. Complaining 
> >>about the health insurance as big government issue is like 
> a raindrop 
> >>in the pond compared to what the corporations are doing to 
> create and 
> >>foster big government.
> >>
> >>To recap your side's argument (from "our" perspective):
> >>
> >>1) Big government is bad when it helps the individual.
> >>2) Big government is good when it helps corporations profit and 
> >>control government.
> >>
> >>On 1/17/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Here's the real difference between the sides that I can 
> see (please 
> >>>correct me if I'm mis-stating it):
> >>>
> >>>(1.) You, Larry, and others feel that because a business is 
> >>>successful, agents of the government should be able to force it to 
> >>>help solve social problems.  Further, you think that people who 
> >>>voluntarily accept positions with the company need the 
> government's 
> >>>defense.
> >>>
> >>>(2.) T-Bone, Nick, and others want as little gov't as possible and 
> >>>especially don't think those that have worked their ass off to get 
> >>>what they have should be penalized for it.
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > 
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:192715
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to