the point I was making was that using something very hateful to
ridicule a people based on their beliefs is incitement no matter what.

larry

On 1/31/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But why would using the blood libel in a song ridiculing Meyer Kahan be
> comparable? It's a Christian thing used to ridicule a Jew.
> Either you don't understand my logic or I don't understand the point your
> making.
>
>
>
> > Its pretty nasty. Its one of the foulest things that christians have
> > made against the jewish people involving blood sacrifices of christian
> > infancts. Its an integral part of the Protocols of Zion, but has been
> > around since the time of Constantine. Its one of those things that
> > deserves to be suppressed.
> >
> > larry
> >
> > On 1/31/06, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Um, explanation please for those of us who might not be up to speed on
> >> our
> >> Jewish history......
> >>
> >>
> >> > So by that logic, then you have no problem with something using the
> >> > blood myth in a song ridculing the Meyer Kane followers.
> >> >
> >> > larry
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:195317
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to