Initially, it may have been political commentary, it may have been ok. But when newspapers start to republish it and publish similar things it becomes nothing more than a "f*** you muslims".
I would wager the same would never happen if it were the Virgin Mary, Jesus Christ, or an image of the temple in Jerusalem. It isn't that the thing is blasphemous in the first instance, of course it could have been a political commentary, ironic cartoon whatever. But when you repeat it for no other reason than to BE offensive, I think that's where the problem is. On 2/1/06, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On the other hand, I completely support the right of anyone offended > by this to protest. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:195429 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
