That means you agree with me, doesn't it? Question for you - do you have a getter and setter for every property of an object, or just those that really need one?
- Matt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Loathe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Community" <cf-community@houseoffusion.com> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 11:53 AM Subject: RE: B-E-A-UTIFUL! >I prefer data access objects, specific getters and setters as part of my > object. > > By specifying columns and datatypes and so on, you get better performing > queies. > > Tim > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chesty Puller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 10:30 AM >> To: CF-Community >> Subject: Re: B-E-A-UTIFUL! >> >> >> Not that I doubt that it is indeed spiffy, how in fact is it so? I don't >> understand why this complex-looking piece of sql abstraction is an >> improvement over either standard SQL or the object-relational database >> mapping scheme >> >> This is Issac's - I think it's more difficult to understand than classic >> SQL. Not bad, but not really an improvement - all of the fields in the >> table are returned, right? >> >> ds = request.tapi.getObject("datasource") >> statement = ds.getStatement("select").init("mytable") >> qry = statement.filter("X",x,"=").filter("Y",y,"=").execute() >> >> >> I think I'd rather do something like: >> >> object = objectmapper.get(objectid) >> >> which replaces >> >> select >> objectid, objectproperty1, objectproperty2, objectproperty3 >> from >> table >> where >> objectid = #objectid# >> >> Even better, the programmer can further abstract the use of the query by >> adding parameters to the get method of the objectmapper class. >> This way you >> end up with a complete class in and out of the database. You >> don't write a >> lot of queries over and over, you don't find new ways to join the data in >> the db (unless you're doing reporting, which is a different subject >> altogether), and you use classic OOP for code readability, >> maintenence and >> reuse. >> >> Anyway, my question is, exactly why is Issac's code spiffy? >> >> - Matt >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "William Bowen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "CF-Community" <cf-community@houseoffusion.com> >> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 10:06 AM >> Subject: Re: B-E-A-UTIFUL! >> >> >> >> Everyone else just ignored you. :-p >> > >> > Bah! Not ignoring! Just trying to figure out how I can use this! >> > >> > it is indeed "damn spiffy code." >> > >> > will >> > -- >> > >> > "If my life weren't funny, it would just be true; >> > and that would just be unacceptable." >> > - Carrie Fisher >> > >> > >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:195671 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
