> I would disagree. There have been debates that did not involve > attacking jews where people questioned the extent of the holocaust, or > whether it even happened. not all these people hate jews.
Anyone who's questioning the extent of the holocaust, or whether it even happened, has absolutely no historical ground to stand on. It's like arguing that dinosaurs never existed....you can DO it, but your a joke. It is reasonable to assume anyone arguing something so assinine, has ulterior motives for doing so. Or perhaps they are just that stupid...i guess that IS possible. > > And the question is not whether or not the speech is anti-semitic, the > question is why is anti-semitic speech widely recognised as being > irresponsible to publish and an accepted curtailment of Free Speech > when and other types of bigotry, or racism, religious insensitivity > etc. does not enjoy such understanding. That simply is not the case, at least not here in the US. ALL types of insensitive speech are irresponsible to publish, but here you do have the freedom to publish it. I don't think anti-semitic publishings have any special place here among bigoted propaganda. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:198634 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
