i believe that's spelled *nucular*. :) Larry C. Lyons wrote: > I was referring to nuclear weapons. > > So the bush administration was never referring to them? Is that what > you're claiming. That there was never any yellow cake uranium claims? > Or that those aluminium tubes were actually for rockets? > > On 3/17/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> No, but I am saying the IAEA wasn't charged with looking into chemical and >> biological weapons. So while they didn't find nuclear weapon making stuff, I >> don't recall them concluding on the other stuff. >> >> Did they? Where in this report did they state they looked for chemical and >> biological weapons and couldn't find any? >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 11:08 AM >>> To: CF-Community >>> Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack >>> >>> OK are you saying that nuclear weapons are NOT WMD's >>> >>> next thing you know you'll be quibbling over the definition of is. >>> >>> On 3/17/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Uh, when did the IAEA have anything to do with Chemical weapons? >> >> >> > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:200432 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
