There were no weapons found, there is no was to ever prove they did or did not exist at this point.
BTW Why is that "spin"? Are all of my statements true? How about you stop with America bashing bullshit? And the anti-Semitic bullshit that you lefties like to spout. It makes me sick. How about instead of sitting around bitching you actually stand for something, with not only your principles, but your life on the line? -- Tim Heald [EMAIL PROTECTED] 703-300-3911 -----Original Message----- From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 11:51 AM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack how about you actually deal with the point being discussed instead of spouting another load of spin. On 3/17/06, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about the violations of the cease fire? > > How about the UN resolutions allowing us to use force to enforce the > sanctions that were being violated? > > How about the attacks against American Aircraft? > > How about the fact that oil is actually of vital importance to the > national security of the United States? > > > -- > Tim Heald > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 703-300-3911 > -----Original Message----- > From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 3:16 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack > > That's what blows all the "this means we were right to go in" > arguments apart. We had ways of finding out if he did have WMD and the > UK and US governments didn't let the people involved finish their work. > > On 3/17/06, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Just a reminder the people on the ground, the UN inspectors who were > > in Iraq, and the IAEA always said that there were no WMD's. > > > > On 3/16/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > When you have your own guys, plus other countries all agreeing > > > that they have them, then the risk factor seems within the bounds. > > > > > > If you try it and you turn out wrong, then people second guess, > > > which is good if it makes us better, but when the point is just to > > > belittle then it doesn't help anybody. > > > > > > Were mistakes made? Clearly. However I don't think they could have > > > done this any other way. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 7:13 PM > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack > > > > > > > > > Dino wrote: > > > > > Israel only attacked Iraq when they were building a nuclear > > > > > reactor > > > for > > > > the > > > > > express purpose of gaining nukes to attack Israel. > > > > > > > > Combine that with what gMoney said and you have: > > > > > > > > 1.) If we thought there was a threat, why didn't we just bomb > > > > the shit out of it w/o having to go in? Lame Answer: mobile labs. > > > > Apparently REALLY mobile. So mobile they don't exist. Which > > > > brings > us to ... > > > > > > > > 2.) Why don't we know how reliable our intelligence is? From > > > > the beginning the whole everybody-thought-blah-blah-blah strikes > > > > me as absolutely moronic. It's called risk management - I know > > > > they offer classes at HBS on the topic. Bush must've skipped them. > > > > Whenever you have intelligence you have a reliability factor on > > > > it. Either ours was low and we went in anyway or we haven't > > > > learned shit about intelligence in the last 50 years. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:200450 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
