I'm proposing how I would make a decision were I a resident of New Orleans. I am suggesting that someone STAY and get involved in solving the problem. I am suggesting that if change is impossible, you would be a fool to stay any longer.
Essentially, that you shouldn't comlain about the problem unless you are willing to do something to fix it. And if it's not fixable, that you should get out of denial and get out of a dangerous and inevitable position. Taken out of context, "you think people should get out of New Orleans" is NOT the same thing. It's like you saying "women should get out of abusive relationships" and me coming back and rephasing it - saying "Dana thinks all women should leave their husbands". -Cameron On 6/4/06, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ah sorry... was confused by the following: > > Given the above facts, it does make a whole lot of sense to get the > heck outta dodge. I mean I am all about getting involved in solving > the problem, but once you realise that you can't make a difference, > it's time to go. > > What *are* you proposing? I am asking. > > > Nope - didn't say that either. But I guess you can believe what you'd > > like. > > > > On 6/2/06, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > But... you think people should get out of New Orleans... and > > Manhattan's at greater risk... > > > > > > >convinced you of what esactly? I don't remember advocating the > > > >evacuation of manhattan. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:208096 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54