On 8/10/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I guess my point is to the "media conspiracy." I don't see one. Sure > there are mistakes, sure there are bad journalists, but there's no > conspiracy that I can see. >
Then we've actually agreed this whole time, cuz I don't see a media conspiracy either. Just a couple cases of bad behavior. You pointed out that their transgressions are so public, and that just begs people to draw conclusions as to their motivation. My conclusion was that they probably did it for personal gain of some kind...maybe just to sell pictures. That's not conspiracy, but it still pisses me off, because it's dishonest and misleading to the public...aka ME! Even if it doesn't affect the material point of the story THIS time...who's to say about next time? It's a precedent we don't want to set and behavior we cannot condone, no matter the motivation. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:212908 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
