On 10/26/06, Russel Madere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I support stem cell research. I think it has great promise. But to say > it is the only research that shows promise for diseases such as Parkinsons, > ALS or MD is intellectually dishonest.
Sure would be dishonest...but who is now, or has ever, said that it's the ONLY promise? I've never heard that argument. I have heard that it presents the BEST possible avenue, and that is both honest and accurate. I do not support embryonic stem cell research that destroys embryos. If a > way to create embryonic stem cells is created that does not destroy an > embryo I will be a whole hearted supporter. For me, the embryonic stem cell > research potential is the same as offering me a cure for cancer that > requires the killing of an autistic person to produce the cure. And that makes your objection religious, or at least moral. Which I completely respect man. As long as we agree that there is scientific promise, BIG scientific promise....it's all good. It is morally equivilent TO ME. I don't expect you to support the same, but > don't expect me to respect you morally. Hey, rock on man. -- "If I had a million dollars, I'd buy you an exotic pet...like a llama, or an emu." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:218434 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
