I don't either and I am not sure how anyone can be *sure* it was all made up unless they want to be, for ideological reasons perhaps. And as Jerry points out, a number of people have changed their minds about a number of things since 1975...
ah well. Kerry isn't even *running* and Bush still wants to use him as a straw man is the way I see it. It is easy and even funny to retort that Kerry *is* a straw man, the only man in national politics to have been described as a haunted tree, but c'mon. There are bigger issues. My local weekly points out that in the infamouus Wilson-Madrid race so much mud has been slung that it it has stuck to both candidates, true, but if you stick to the issues Wilson still needs to go and Madrid has a number of redeeming feature in her record as Attorney-General, things that have benefitted the state. That's probably the way to be: concentrate on who has a better record on the actual issues. >I dunno Dana. I've heard many servicemen say that his testimony exaggerated >or even invented some of the atrocities. I don't know if that is true or >not. > >A lot is perception, and Kerry's perception in the military doesn't seem >very good, for whatever reason. > >On 11/2/06, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:219249 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
