no ;) I didn't. Nice try though. I have however previously made the point that this is a point of view that almost certainly exists and does not respond easily or well to a surge in tanks and soldiers ;)
You keep saying that most people support our presence there, but the facts do not support this. I believe it was that dangerous radical George Will who recently cited a poll that said 80% of respondents considered us foreign occupiers. Dana On 1/19/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Didn't you used to cal l them freedom fighters? I gess it depends on > which side you're on. > As I said, most do not support the terrorists so only the terrorists > consider themselves martyrs. Since they are now using innocent > victims, the willing to die pool is obviously getting very small. > > > On 1/19/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > who are perhaps known in Iraq as "the valiant few who are willing to > > martyr themselves to remove the infidel invader from our land" Sam, > > think about that. It's all a matter of definition. The Bushies should > > understand that -- they are good at definitions like that. Did I ever > > mention that it's ok for an oil company to pollute the water supply > > for an entire state because the definitions of pollution have been > > revised to exclude oil products? Google Otero Mesa. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:225195 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
