So you're saying it is OK for some Presidents to use it but not for Bush because you don't like or trust him. Got it.
Does that mean Lincoln freeing the slaves was legal? Maybe? On 2/9/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Clinton did not have the signing statement down to the art form that Bush > does. > And that is just one of many manifestations of this administration's > arrogance. My favorite is the "we can lock you up and never have to > say why" thing. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:227611 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
