> Sam wrote:
> If you went around the world and balanced everyone's carbon footprint,
> we could all use more without guilt. It is stupid.
>

It's not about *us* doing it, it's about *you* doing it.  So, for
example, let's say that because my car gets 12mpg I decide that
anything under 100mpg is not responsible so I decide to offset.

What'd I'd do is figure out what damage I'm causing with my 88mpg
deficit; let's say it's 4.6 carbon units.  If I buy offsets for 5
carbon units I'm carbon negative.

The theory being that the Earth can stand only, say, 100 carbon units
per year.  If we trade carbon units on a carbon market such that the
end result is 95 carbon units per year, we're carbon negative.

So, maybe your allocation is 1 carbon unit, but because you're willing
to ride your bike you don't need it.  So I pay you $1000 for your
carbon unit.  And buy 4 more.  In this way I get my car AND the Earth
stays under 100 units.

See, it's not so tough, if you agree with the theory.

BTW - I paid a $2000 gas guzzler tax on my car so I'm already paid up.  W00T!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Create robust enterprise, web RIAs.
Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:229163
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to