> RoMunn wrote:
> I actually see this as progress.

Progress towards what?  Despite the fact that nobody can articulate
it, let's just speculate at some foreign policy initiatives that Bush
could be pursuing:

(P1.) Fight the terrorists in Iraq so we don't have to fight them in Iowa.
     (Q1.) Then wouldn't we want to stay in Iraq even if they ask us
to leave?  They're our terrorist wall so we can't leave, right?

(P2.) Spread democracy to the Middle East
     (Q2.) Then why do we have troops in only Iraq, and then shouldn't
the State Department run the show?  And wouldn't we want more allies
than Britain (who's leaving)?

(P3.) Fight for a United Iraq.
     (Q3.) Why would we want that?

In the end we've got a region that's full of people who don't want to
be a united country, but we're forcing them too while providing
security in their major city.  What's the benefit to that again?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Create Web Applications With ColdFusion MX7 & Flex 2. 
Build powerful, scalable RIAs. Free Trial
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJS 

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:234700
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to