> cHat wrote: > See, the case isn't, "Libby is innocent and these others are guilty," > it's, "these guys all lied to a grand jury and should face the same > charges and sentence as Libby." >
Now THAT makes sense. However since it's left to the prosecutor's judgment on who to pursue and to the Grand Jury on who to indict, you have to be comfortable that the prosecutor is making the right decisions. With a guy appointed by Bush and judge appointed by Bush, I don't know how you could stack the deck more in Libby's favor or more out of Plame's favor. Of course sometimes prosecutors make incredibly bad calls: Nifong. But then he's been disbarred and will be civilly sued. In this case, however, there are no charges of malicious prosecution nor of dereliction of duty or political favoritism. I would think that if the facts showed Fitzgerald to be truly malicious or showing favorites SOMEBODY would try to nail him for it. Since nobody has we can only assume that there's no case to do so. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 The most significant release in over 10 years. Upgrade & see new features. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion?sdid=RVJR Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:237710 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
