> Sam wrote: > Two stories: > http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article1720024.ece >
So ... there's data that says it could be happening, and maybe bad, but here's also things that say it may not be (your links). Beyond that, if there is GW (meaning not "common cause" variance, but "special cause" variance) it may be human caused or natural. So, given all that, wouldn't you agree that we should be taking action if only to manage the risk that GW is occurring? Part of that action would be determine cause, as much as possible (since you'd have to take action you need to determine as best as possible the cause, i.e., human or not). ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Check out the new features and enhancements in the latest product release - download the "What's New PDF" now http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/coldfusion/cf8_beta_whatsnew_052907.pdf Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:240792 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
