Without 9/11, there isn't a snowball's chance in hell that Bush gets the
backing necessary to invade Iraq. Not going to happen.

That is what I meant when I said that 9/11 made the attack on Iraq possible.
Maybe the word "cause" isn't the right word, but the fact is...without 9/11,
no Iraq.

On Jan 29, 2008 11:58 AM, Matt Quackenbush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 9/11 was most certainly *not* the cause of our invasion of Iraq.  It was
> the
> _excuse_ that Bush so desperately needed and desired to engage the
> American
> public and congress in backing his intentions of war.  Period.
>
> On Jan 29, 2008 11:53 AM, G Money wrote:
>
> > On Jan 29, 2008 11:20 AM, Dana wrote:
> >
> > > why in the name of all that is holy are intelligent people *still*
> > > bringing up 9/11 as a cause of the invasion of Iraq? If it is a cause
> > > it is a sign of dysfunction.
> > >
> >
> > Because it WAS the cause, Dana, and THAT is the dysfunction. See?
> >
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:252393
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to