P R E - E M P T I V E TACTICAL NUKES eliminate the threat before it becomes too much of a threat.
that would work, right? tw On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 3:43 PM, Adam Churvis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, and the main problem seemed to be the ease with which the enemy can > confound our anti-satellite/anti-munition efforts. > > Seems that if the enemy just encases their incoming package in a metalized > mylar balloon inflated with gas, then inflate a dozen similar balloons with > nothing but gas, and scatter them all, we can't tell one from the other > using any method currently available to us. > > Respectfully, > > Adam Phillip Churvis > President > Productivity Enhancement > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: G Money [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2008 3:30 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: Bullseye! > > > > We couldn't really pick off hundreds of inbound ballistic missiles like > > we > > were shooting clay pigeons though, could we? I mean, shooting down a > > predictably orbiting, dead satellite is one thing....but i thought most > > of > > our Star Wars intercept tests had been pretty much failures?? > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:254747 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
