** Private ** wrote: > Comcast's "throttling" approach (currently being tested in one city) seems > to be more reasonable: make sure the heavy users aren't affecting others, > but don't actually enforce any transfer limits.
I wouldn't be so sure it is more reasonable without knowing exactly how it works. How do they throttle? On the ATM channel? On the IP layer? On the TCP layer? Will their throttling hit their own VoIP offering as hard as it hits Skype (which uses a protocol that could easily be 'mistaken' for P2P)? Jochem ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;192386516;25150098;k Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:261367 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
