wait a minute -- in neo-con reality the US now had UN support for the invasion of Iraq? I thought the politically correct line was that you could not have the UN telling the US what to do? For an organization that supported the war in Iraq, they sure changed their mind fast :) as early as the following year, Kofi Annan was calling it an illegal war of aggresion :)
Dana On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are clear distinctions between the US-led invasion of Iraq > (supported by UN resolutions and lots of countries besides the US) and > the Russian invasion of Georgia, such as it is, but clearly this is an > area of political vulnerability that Putin and his cronies are trying > to exploit. The question is why you are buying into it. > > > > On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 9:18 PM, Gruss wrote: > > So I was listening to Bush, McCain, and Condi all repeat the same > > talking point: "in the 21st century nations don't invade other nations > > ...." > > > > Um. Really? Cause didn't you just do that in the most disasterous > > way possible? > > > > Are these people truly the stupidest foreign policy administration > > we've ever had? > > > > The new neo-con talking point is how outrageous it is for a country to > > invade another country and occupy its capital??? And their selected > > nominee gets himself jacked up with Dancing Queen? > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:265985 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
