What kind of sick parent let's their children's future go away because of a mistake they made at 17? The "true" value would be to take the baby to term and then give it up for adoption. Therefore foregoing the divorce that would happen in a few years and bypassing the child only having one parent.
On Sep 1, 2008, at 2:41 PM, Robert Munn wrote: > Didn't Palin want the brother-in-law fired because he tasered the > kids? So which part are you OK with, the guy tasering the kids or > getting to keep his job? > > As for the daughter, she's keeping the baby and marrying the father, > that pretty much is what Republicans refer to as family values. Maybe > not the best judgment getting pregnant at 17, but since when are young > people not allowed to make mistakes? > > Palin has stood by her husband and kids through ups and downs, and you > want to make that a bad thing. Too bad more people don't follow her > example. > > On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 11:53 AM, Maureen wrote: >> Yeah, the daughter's pregnant, the husband has DUIs, and the >> brother-in-law tasered his kids. You just gotta love these >> republican >> family values. >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:267290 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
