Of course it doesn't meet the standards of science. I don't however see the problem if it comes up in say philosophy or literature.
Also, I don't see discussing something is the same thing as proclaiming it fact. Simply allowing for the possibility isn't saying it did in fact happen. G Money wrote: > That's pretty much exactly what I believe, Loathe. > > You and I are entitled to our opinions (which I think are correct, of > course), and we aren't cultists or religious zealots or anything like > that.....UNLESS we want to teach what we believe as if it were science. > > THAT is where we'd cross the line. > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I personally think that we can't explain the beginning, that evolution >> theory could very well just be the method that whatever creator used to >> get us to our current state. You know, know one can know the mind of >> god type deal? Don't follow any religion, just think something started it. >> >> When I see the way the planets revolve around the sun, and the way that >> mimics the nucleus and electrons in an atom, it seems to be more than a >> coincidence. The veins in a leaf, things like that. >> >> I don't think I'm a cultist. >> >> Cameron Childress wrote: >>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> Anyone that believes in any kind of creation is a cultist now? >>> >>> That might be. I haven't checked with all of them yet. >>> >>> -Cameron >>> >>> >>> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:267616 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
