you have seen (rare) examples of it but usually not - job description of "court jester" on list precludes doing it very often ;-)
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 9:01 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Not getting any (RE: Why (Re: They invaded! 0_0)) > > > Yep, I was. If it was possible I'd be all for it. > > At 11:49 AM 4/2/02, you wrote: > >Mikey- > > > >you're assuming I was serious > >;-) > > > >-Ben > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 8:51 AM > >> To: CF-Community > >> Subject: Not getting any (RE: Why (Re: They invaded! 0_0)) > >> > >> > >> Your assuming that women in the middle east (at least in most > >> Muslim cultures) have the right to refuse. The rights of > >> women are very restricted even in such places as Saudi > >> Arabia. A woman can be arrested for just driving a car (as > >> was seen during the gulf war when a number of women tried it > >> in protest). > >> > >> At 11:33 AM 4/2/02, you wrote: > >> >Hey! > >> >What we need for peace is a Middle East version of Lysistrata - > >> >the women say "until we get peace, you're not getting any" !! > >> >-Ben > >> > > >> > > >> >> -----Original Message----- > >> >> From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >> >> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 8:13 AM > >> >> To: CF-Community > >> >> Subject: Re: Why (Re: They invaded! 0_0) > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> Another example of terrorism: > >> >> > >> >> British suffragists early last century. > >> >> > >> >> (Just finished reading a book on this subject - they were > >> >> some SCARY women!) > >> >> > >> >> Jerry Johnson > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/02/02 10:57AM >>> > >> >> More like treasonist. > >> >> > >> >> They didn't do too much killing of the women and children, > >> >> and no suicide > >> >> bombings. They only attacked people with ties to the British > >> >> Government, > >> >> mostly military ties, a few people with monetary ties, like > >> >> tax collectors > >> >> and the customs officers. > >> >> > >> >> At 10:52 AM 4/2/2002 -0500, you wrote: > >> >> >Agreed. I'm the colonists that rebeled against England were > >> >> considered > >> >> >terrorists at the time. Probably still could be. > >> >> > > >> >> >Todd > >> >> > > >> >> >----- Original Message ----- > >> >> >From: "Mark Smyth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> >To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> >Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 10:42 AM > >> >> >Subject: RE: Why (Re: They invaded! 0_0) > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >They (the Palistinians) are the terrorists. > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Surely the issue of whether they are terrorists > depends on your > >> >> >perspective > >> >> > > of the situation? I'm not condoning anything, its just > >> >> an observation > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-community@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
