Robert Munn wrote: > Ian neglected to mention that the top earners already pay the VAST > majority of all income taxes.
No, Ian wasn't contrasting the plans, rather pointing out that saying source B is better then source A is rather silly and shows poor logich when source B is exclusively using source A to make it's point. Now if anybody wants to start a simple and straight forward discussion of the merits of each plan, that would be interesting. But so far all we seem to have is arguments attack the source rather then a discussion of the merits. So far we have a seemingly respected source neutrally describing the projected effects of the two plans. I have yet to see much good debate on why plan A is better or worse the plan B. Just more OMFG type stuff that taxes will go up AND|OR down depending on which plan and which tax bracket we talk about. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:268171 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5