On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > eh if you follow that logic though a lot of rural places out west > would still be roadless wildernesses. There may be an argument against > using federal funds, thought i am sure sure I'd agree with it. But > state? Gimme a break. > > Personally I I am rather glad there's a road to Chaco Canyon, even if > there are very few local residents.
I agree. States should have more power and tax locally - then choose how to spend it within their own state. Less dependence on the federal system for these sorts of things would be great. Then you have 50 states doing it "their own way" and plenty of competition about how they are doing it. Then if you didn't like the way a state operated, you could more out of it. Kinda like my decision to move out of taxifornia.... -Cameron ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:269016 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
