well hell. No charges have been filed in the hacking either, if that is the standard for illegality... so why do you say that that on the other hand is definitely illegal?
it looked more than occasional to me. They are still investigating the Bush White House for this. There is email in there to the governor of California for crying out loud. Which brings us to the more important issue, criminal stupidity. Dude, organizational security? her password evidently was guessable -- her wedding anniversary or something of the kind. Her baby's name. Whatever. And you don't see a problem there? Would she continue as VP or god forbid president to use the account? Can't you just see the Russian Mafia trying to figure out which kid's name she is using now, so that can see what the status is of talks with Pakistan or North Korea? How about a nice denial of service? Enterprise security uses firewalls, switches and separate servers for a reason, you know.... On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The fact that she uses a private email address for occasional state > business was already public knowledge, and no charges have been filed. > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:17 AM, William wrote: >>> Are you alleging an actual crime, and if so, what? >> >> Isn't conducting state business on a non-state e-mail system (and >> therefore not archived per state regs) is illegal in l'etat d'Alaska. >> That certainly seems to be the implication here. >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:270115 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
