> again with Bush? ::shrug:: they seem to have the same problem, what can I say? I can't help it if they are stupid too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_White_House_e-mail_controversy > I think criminal stupidity is assuming that professional hackers can't > get into most things they want to get into. Well gee then. Let's not bother with any kind of security safeguards. Seriously, do you know how stupid that statement makes you sound? It's pretty well accepted in network security that very high-level data integrity and security is possible IF USERS FOLLOW PROCEDURES. Which Palin seems to have a problem doing. I am an RSA SecureID certified administrator, Robert, and I work in network security. This is arguably an expert opinion here. Not an assumption. I dunno if Alaska uses RSA but the Pentagon probably does. Or should. It's not hackable unless the user writes the password down or tells it to someone, then hands over the token as well. So unhackable does exist, dude. If people have proper respect for security. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;203748912;27390454;j Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:270129 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
