I read it. The "evidence" consists of an email she sent asking about Wooten, and a single conversation she had with Monegan, where he said "leave it to Todd", and she said, "OK".
As I also noted previously, she says that she told Todd to drop it. That's not in this report. As I also noted previously, she says Wooten and another person hatched a revenge plot centered around this subject. That's not in the report. As I also noted previously, the Palins' frustration of the matter (which started way before she was elected Governor) stems from the fact that the police force was unable, by law, to provide them with any feedback about their legitimate concerns about a state trooper. The panel that created the report thought it was such a problem that they recommended changing the law to allow people who complain about a state employee's conduct to receive feedback about the outcome of the complaint. As I also noted previously, there is nothing about Wooten's conduct except what the Palins said. No investigation of his work history or the allegations of drinking on the job, workers comp fraud, tasering a kid, or anything else. So if you want to talk about being fair and having a full exploration of the facts in the case, well, this report is just a piece of shit. On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Jerry wrote: > The paragraph you quoted says this: > > [and there is evidence of her active participation]. > > Did you not read that part? Did the [] make it invisible? > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:274160 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
