It's certainly not genetically defective. In fact homosexuality appears in many species, not just humans. However mother nature (for lack of a better term) has just made it so that it can't be (naturally) genetically passed on. It's the exception to the rule.
-----Original message----- From: Scott Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:17:13 -0500 To: cf-community cf-community@houseoffusion.com Subject: Re: the list > I could certainly see the evolutionary benefit in ending procreation in > defective gene lines, as part of natural selection > (and no, before anyone even asks, I'm not implying that homosexuality is > in any way genetically defective) > > Michael Grant [Modus I.S.] wrote: > > "That there very well may have been evolutionary benefits to homosexuality" > > > > Explain the benefits to not being able to continue a species? > > > > > > -----Original message----- > > From: Ian Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:56:04 -0500 > > To: cf-community cf-community@houseoffusion.com > > Subject: Re: the list > > > > > >> Michael Grant wrote: > >> > >>> ... > >>> > >> Pinhead. > >> > >> I'll let others with more time to point out some of the many short > >> comings in your arguments. That there very well may have been > >> evolutionary benefits to homosexuality. That there are more ways to be > >> productive to society then having children. Etc. > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:280753 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
