You seem to have selective amnesia. The argument back then was that it would be disastrous to our economy. Everything had CFC's in it. People would hate the alternatives and the alternatives were inferior, no one would use them, blah blah blah. Why spend untold amounts of money on a theory that may or may not be true and if it was still might not make a difference for decades if ever?
Same fucking story 20 years later. Oddly enough, by much the same people inside government and out. Been a really tired record going around and around. Judah On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Robert Munn <cfmuns...@gmail.com> wrote: > The economic impact of banning CFCs was minimal. The economic impact of > "going green" would be catastrophic - unless an economical alternative is > found. If an alternative exists, problem solved. If not, no amount of > whinging about CFCs is going to bridge the gap. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:283297 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
