http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/15/AR2009011503149.html?hpid=opinionsbox1

Except for Richard Nixon, no president since Harry Truman has left
office more unloved than George W. Bush. Truman's rehabilitation took
decades. Bush's will come sooner. Indeed, it has already begun. The
chief revisionist? Barack Obama.

Vindication is being expressed not in words but in deeds -- the tacit
endorsement conveyed by the Obama continuity-we-can-believe-in
transition. It's not just the retention of such key figures as Defense
Secretary Bob Gates or Treasury Secretary nominee Timothy Geithner,
who, as president of the New York Fed, has been instrumental in
guiding the Bush financial rescue over the past year. It's the
continuity of policy.

It is the repeated pledge to conduct a withdrawal from Iraq that does
not destabilize its new democracy and that, as Vice President-elect
Joe Biden said just this week in Baghdad, adheres to the
Bush-negotiated status-of-forces agreement that envisions a U.S.
withdrawal over three years, not the 16-month timetable on which Obama
campaigned.

It is the great care Obama is taking in not preemptively abandoning
the anti-terror infrastructure that the Bush administration leaves
behind. While still a candidate, Obama voted for the expanded
presidential wiretapping (FISA) powers that Bush had fervently
pursued. And while Obama opposes waterboarding (already banned, by the
way, by Bush's CIA in 2006), he declined George Stephanopoulos's
invitation (on ABC's "This Week") to outlaw all interrogation not
permitted by the Army Field Manual. Explained Obama: "Dick Cheney's
advice was good, which is let's make sure we know everything that's
being done," i.e., before throwing out methods simply because Obama
campaigned against them.

Obama still disagrees with Cheney's view of the acceptability of some
of these techniques. But citing as sage the advice offered by "the
most dangerous vice president we've had probably in American history"
(according to Joe Biden) -- advice paraphrased by Obama as "we
shouldn't be making judgments on the basis of incomplete information
or campaign rhetoric" -- is a startlingly early sign of a newly
respectful consideration of the Bush-Cheney legacy.

Not from any change of heart. But from simple reality. The beauty of
democratic rotations of power is that when the opposition takes
office, cheap criticism and calumny will no longer do. The Democrats
now own Iraq. They own the war on al-Qaeda. And they own the panoply
of anti-terror measures with which the Bush administration kept us
safe these past seven years.

Which is why Obama is consciously creating a gulf between what he now
dismissively calls "campaign rhetoric" and the policy choices he must
make as president. Accordingly, Newsweek -- Obama acolyte and scourge
of everything Bush/Cheney -- has on the eve of the Democratic
restoration miraculously discovered the arguments for warrantless
wiretaps, enhanced interrogation and detention without trial. Indeed,
Newsweek's neck-snapping cover declares, "Why Obama May Soon Find
Virtue in Cheney's Vision of Power."

Obama will be loath to throw away the tools that have kept the
homeland safe. Just as he will be loath to jeopardize the remarkable
turnaround in American fortunes in Iraq.

Obama opposed the war. But the war is all but over. What remains is an
Iraq turned from aggressive, hostile power in the heart of the Middle
East to an emerging democracy openly allied with the United States. No
president would want to be responsible for undoing that success.

In Iraq, Bush rightly took criticism for all that went wrong -- the
WMD fiasco, Abu Ghraib, the descent into bloody chaos in 2005-06. Then
Bush goes to Baghdad to ratify the ultimate post-surge success of that
troubled campaign -- the signing of a strategic partnership between
the United States and Iraq -- and ends up dodging two size 10 shoes
for his pains.

Absorbing that insult was Bush's final service on Iraq. Whatever venom
the war generated is concentrated on Bush himself. By having
personalized the responsibility for the awfulness of the war, Bush has
done his successor a favor. Obama enters office with a strategic
success on his hands -- while Bush leaves the scene taking a shoe for
his country.

Which I suspect is why Bush showed such equanimity during a private
farewell interview at the White House a few weeks ago. He leaves
behind the sinews of war, for the creation of which he has been so
vilified but which will serve his successor -- and his country -- well
over the coming years. The very continuation by Democrats of Bush's
policies will be grudging, if silent, acknowledgment of how much he
got right.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:285219
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to