> Cam wrote: >> Bet here's the common mistake: >> If something's not working you don't add more of it thinking that'll >> help; AND you don't get of it thinking it'll fix the problem. > > Huh? >
Take any program, say an aircraft maintenance program. If it's designed right it's meant to meet some measure(s) on some periodic basis; let's say one measure might be ODI or operational difficulty index. This is when an aircraft can't do it's work because of maintenance problems. Let's say, in this case, the ODI is high. A good maintenance manager will fix the program through some analysis of faults. In government, however, the reason for the program gets lost so there's no re-tooling as in the case of ODI. And so the political chatter you hear is usually one of 2 things: 1.) It's not working, kill the program, or 2.) It's not working, throw money at it/do more of it. In other words, if you want to get rid of government you better make sure you know who, what, why, where. Because otherwise it'd be like telling the maintenance manager that the ODI is too high so get rid of the pesky bureaucratic maintenance program. It'll save money in the short run, but it'll cause disaster down the road. And that's what happens when you have a disdain for government. Disaster. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:288641 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
