That's kind of like saying, if small percentage of the population commits crime, should we really spend money to enforce the laws.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: > > if you have money for drug testing, don't you have money for more > constructive purposes? That's my point. Let's assume that as much as 10% of > the population on social services uses drugs. It may be higher in pockets, > but personally I think the number is high. But it makes the math easier so > let's use it. How are you going to avoid accusations of discrimiation or > racial profiling? Are you going to test everybody? If so how much will > that > cost? What will be the opportunity cost of that expenditure? Will the > expenditure do more harm than good/ > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Cameron Childress <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Dana <[email protected]> wrote: > > > whatever. Drugs are not usually the problem imho. > > > > So it's just a small group messing it up for everyone else who really > > needs and deserves help? Okay - I can buy into that. > > > > So how do we eliminate that group from abusing the system? Drug testing. > > > > Damn. > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;207172674;29440083;f Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:290886 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
