And you have to understand that these people will lie to your face. You can show them a video of them placing an IED, you can see their face plain as day, and they will tell you point blank that it is not them. They did not do that. It is their cousin Muhammad or some shit like that. So yes, lets try "conventional" techniques, then if that does not work, you need to turn it up a notch. There is a point where you as an interrogator will know that the person is telling the truth or not. And I am sure that there are some very weak individuals will confess to something that they did not do just so you will stop, but so what? They should not have been in the wrong place at the wrong time. They'll get over it.
Gruss Gott wrote: > > (1.) You need to understand right vs wrong and that what's wrong > should NEVER be justified as right or you are simply evil. Remember, > Satan thinks he's in the right. > > (2.) In case you've forgotten, torture is evil. Water-boarding, for > example, was used in Vietnam to extract false confessions since that's > all it's good for. It was first used in the 21st century, architected > by Dick Cheney, to extract false confession in an effort to link Al > Quaeda to Iraq. > > (3.) If America doesn't stand for what's right, who will? If all > America now is, is evil that claims it isn't, then America has been > murdered by its own citizens. > > That having been said, proper interrogation has been known for eons. > You might want to consider the teachings of Hans Scharff, the lead > Nazi interrogator: > > "Scharff was opposed to physically abusing prisoners with the intent > to obtain information. Taught on the job, Scharff instead relied upon > the Luftwaffe's approved list of techniques which mostly involved > making the interrogator seem as if he is his prisoner's greatest > advocate while in captivity." > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanns_Scharff#Technique > > or maybe the guy who actually GOT useful information from terrorists, > Ali Soufan: > > "Most notably, his testimony revealed that his interrogation of Abu > Zubaydah had resulted in actionable Intelligence; and that thereafter, > when torture techniques were implemented (waterboarding), the flow of > Intel stopped. Soufan's statement is contrary to the ones made in the > "torture memos," that were intent on making a legal case in favor of > and justification for the use of these techniques." > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ali_Soufan#Guantanamo_interrogations > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:297434 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
