On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Judah McAuley wrote: > > The general answer to this question is: Science doesn't prove the > supernatural. But it does continually redefine what is supernatural. > As I initially stated, a lot of things we take for granted as science > subjects now were universally thought to be supernatural. That process > is likely to continue.
Science has already "proved" more crazy crap than I can shake a stick at. It's "proved" things that still fit pretty well with "supernatural", *after* proving. Damn. Next I'll start waxing quantum. Nature of reality and whatnot. Never gets old. Never say never, neh? -- He who exercises government by means of his virtue may be compared to the north polar star, which keeps its place and all the stars turn towards it. Confucius ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:308423 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
