A WSJ opinion piece is not data either, its more blather.


On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Robert Munn <cfmuns...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Maureen <mamamaur...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> The planet being really hot and really cold in the past is not the
>> statement for which I asked for data.  The statement you made was that
>> the planet is cooling now.  Where's the data for that?  And quotes
>> from unknown scientists with no credentials presented in a British
>> tabloid doesn't strike me as data
>>
>>
> Witness the first paragraph of Richard 's (MIT Prof) WSJ editorial:
>
> "Is there a reason to be alarmed by the prospect of global warming? Consider
> that the measurement used, the globally averaged temperature anomaly (GATA),
> is always changing. Sometimes it goes up, sometimes down, and
> occasionally—such as for the last dozen years or so—it does little that can
> be discerned."
>
> So I stand corrected- it isn't cooling, it isn't warming, it's flat.
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know 
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/message.cfm/messageid:308902
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to